Inflammatory breast cancer: Epidemiologic data and therapeutic results.

Since the early description more than a century ago, inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) remains an aggressive disease, with a different geographic repartition, with the highest ones incidence reported in the North of Africa (Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, and Egypt), and the lowest incidence in Western countries (USA, Europe…). In this study, we reviewed the literature using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database compared to other published series. We observed that in the high incidence areas (North of Africa) when compared to "classical" breast cancer, IBC was associated to younger age (less than 50 years) with rapid evolution of signs and symptoms (in less than 3 up to 6 months), and more aggressive clinical and histopathological-molecular parameters, due to the predominance of triple-negative and HER2+ subtypes in around 60% of cases. An epidemiologic trend was observed in both high and low incidence areas since the eighties are towards reduction of IBC prevalence. Concerning Tunisia, in comparison with the historical series of the 1980s, the incidence decreased in part by applying more stringent diagnostic criteria but also probably due to a slight improvement of the socio-economic level (SEL). This trend was also observed in the US, due to the efforts of collaborative IBC groups from MD Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC), Duke and IBC patient advocacy groups. Therapeutic results are slightly better due to the standardization of a multidisciplinary approach and the use of combined primary chemotherapy and/or targeted therapies (especially in HER2 positive patients), followed by mastectomy plus radiotherapy. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival is at more than 60%, related to an IBC mortality decrease observed in the cohorts of patients treated in the last decade.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) advocacy-Past, present and future!

Patient advocates, referring to those individuals that have been diagnosed with the disease for which they advocate, are essential stake holders in healthcare. For those facing the stages of being diagnosed with Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC), the "call to advocate" is an immediate response to being diagnosed with a rare and aggressive disease that progresses rapidly, often in a matter of weeks or months. There is a great stigma and bias in the medical community that has inhibited the education and study of IBC. A lack of understanding of the disease, how it presents and how to treat it leaves many IBC patients facing misdiagnosis. Communication is a cornerstone of healthcare; this goes beyond the patient-provider dynamic. Education of IBC must be a grassroots initiative. There should be no barrier to care in the diagnosis, treatment, study and survivorship of inflammatory Breast Cancer. It is not just an oncologist's lesson to learn, but that of all providers in healthcare. In this chapter you will hear how 4 women who were diagnosed with IBC faced the difficult tasks of navigating through the healthcare system on their own and came out on the other side using their experience to help others. In conclusion, in defining the evolving roles of Patient Advocacy in IBC over the past 25 years, we examine what has been done, along with its challenges, and what work still remains from the perspectives of different patient advocates.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Treatment Effects on Survival in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

The objective of this study was to determine the survival rate and the effects of different treatments on patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC). The study employed a systematic approach that included a search strategy across four databases: Embase, Web of Sciences, PubMed, and Scopus. The results obtained were screened initially by titles and abstracts, followed by full-texts in EndNote 8 software. The next stage involved data extraction and qualitative evaluation, where the Metan command was used to estimate the pooled survival rate. A total of 28 studies with a sample size of 63,796 were finally analyzed. The overall 3- and 5-year survival rates (OS) for IBC patients were found to be 52% (95% CI; 46-58%, I2: 99.42%) and 61% (95% CI; 53-69%, I2: 93.63%), respectively. The 5-year OS rates in patients with non-metastatic and metastatic IBC were 59% (95% CI; 54-63%, I2: 98.31%) and 30% (95% CI; 26-35%, I2: 50.84%), respectively. The 5-year OS rate in non-metastatic patients who underwent BCS surgery was 60% (CI 95%; 26-94%, I2: 95.13%). The overall 5- and 3-year OS rates for patients with IBC were lower than those for all types of breast cancer, and the rates were even lower in patients with metastasis. Therefore, it is recommended that healthcare workers and women at risk should be vigilant of early symptoms of IBC to prevent metastasis by seeking medical attention on time.

Low Rates of Local-Regional Recurrence Among Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients After Contemporary Trimodal Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) represents a rare (2-3 %) but aggressive subset of breast cancer with a historically reported 5-year overall survival rate of 50 % and a 3-year local-regional recurrence (LRR) rate of 20 %. This study aimed to evaluate long-term LRR in a contemporary cohort of non-metastatic IBC patients undergoing trimodal therapy at a single institution and identify factors associated with local and distant failure. METHODS: The study identified 262 patients with non-metastatic IBC who received trimodal therapy (neoadjuvant chemotherapy, modified radical mastectomy, adjuvant radiation) from an institutional prospective database (2007-2019). Long-term outcomes of local-regional and distant metastasis were reported. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: The median age at diagnosis was 52 years, and the median follow-up period was 5.1 years. In this cohort, 82 (31.3 %) patients achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR) in the breast and axilla. Local-regional recurrence was observed in 18 (6.9 %) patients (11 isolated to the chest wall, 4 isolated to regional nodes, and 3 involving chest wall and ipsilateral axillary nodes). Distant metastasis was observed in 92 (35.1 %) patients. During the follow-up period, 90 deaths occurred. In the multivariate analysis, pCR was associated with improved disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.26; 95 % confidence interval [CI], 0.13-0.51; p = 0.001) and overall survival (HR, 0.31; 95 % CI, 0.15-0.65; p = 002). CONCLUSIONS: During a median follow-up period longer than 5 years, the local-regional relapse rate for the IBC patients treated with contemporary trimodal therapy was 6.9%, similar to that for the non-IBC patients. After chemotherapy, surgical resection with modified radical mastectomy to negative margins and postmastectomy radiation therapy resulted in excellent long-term local-regional control.

Racial disparities in treatment and outcomes between non-Hispanic Black and non-Hispanic White women with nonmetastatic inflammatory breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The incidence rate of inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is higher among non-Hispanic Black (NHB) than non-Hispanic White (NHW) women. We examined the differences in treatment and outcomes between NHB and NHW women with IBC, accounting for demographic, clinicopathological, and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: We collected data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for NHB and NHW women with IBC diagnosed between 2010-2016. We analyzed the odds of receiving chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery between NHB and NHW women. We evaluated overall survival (OS) with Kaplan-Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards methods. Competing risk analysis was used to compare the risk of breast cancer death between NHB and NHW women. We also evaluated the magnitude of survival disparities within the strata of demographic, socioeconomic, and treatment factors. RESULTS: Among 1,652 NHW and 371 NHB women with IBC, the odds of receiving chemotherapy, surgery, and radiation were similar for NHB and NHW. After 39-month follow-up, the median OS was 40 and 81 months for NHB and NHW, respectively (p < 0.0001). The risk of breast cancer death was higher for NHB than NHW women (5-year risk of breast cancer death, 51% vs. 35%, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: After adjustment for demographic, clinicopathological, and socioeconomic factors; NHB women with IBC had similar odds of receiving surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, but were more likely to die of the disease compared to their NHW counterparts. Our findings suggest the presence of masked tumor biology, treatment, or socioeconomic factors associated with race that can lead to worse IBC outcomes.

Implementation of a Multidisciplinary Inflammatory Breast Cancer Program for Quality Improvement.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory Breast Cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive subtype of breast cancer accounting for only 1% to 5% of cases but comprising 7% to 10% of breast cancer deaths. Diagnosis of IBC can be challenging which can lead to delays in diagnosis and treatment. We formed a multidisciplinary IBC program to address the unique challenges of diagnosing and treating patients with IBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified patients with an IBC CPT code and collected data on the date of the first visit with medical oncology, surgical oncology, or radiation oncology, date of biopsy, and initiation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In 2020, as part of the IBC program at The Ohio State University, the decision tree (DT) was revised to help identify potential IBC patients. These patients were prioritized with a multidisciplinary appointment within 3 days. RESULTS: After adjusting the call center DT, there was a significant decline in the median and mean time from initial contact to chemotherapy initiation and an insignificant decrease in the mean time from contact to biopsy (P = .71884). The median time of contact to chemotherapy was 10 days (range 9-14) in 2020, a decrease of 43% compared to 3 prior years (P = .0068). After initiation of the IBC program, 100% of patients underwent trimodality therapy-neoadjuvant systemic therapy, modified radical mastectomy, and post mastectomy radiation therapy. CONCLUSION: A multidisciplinary IBC program that included scheduling DT with specific questions about IBC symptoms helped identify potential patients and significantly decrease time to treatment and assured completion of trimodality therapy.

Risk-dependent conditional survival analysis and annual hazard rate of inflammatory breast cancer.

PURPOSE: The real-time prognosis of patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) after surviving for several years was unclear. We aimed to estimate survival over time in IBC using conditional survival (CS) and annual hazard functions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study recruited 679 patients diagnosed with IBC between 2010 and 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We used the Kaplan-Meier method to estimate overall survival (OS). CS was the probability of surviving for another y years after surviving for x years after the diagnosis, and the annual hazard rate was the cumulative mortality rate of follow-up patients. Cox regression analyses were used to identify prognostic factors, and changes in real-time survival and immediate mortality in surviving patients were assessed within these prognostic factors. RESULTS: CS analysis showed real-time improvement in survival, with 5-year OS updated annually from the initial 43.5% to 52.2%, 65.3%, 78.5%, and 89.0% (surviving 1-4 years, respectively). However, this improvement was relatively small in the first two years after diagnosis, and the smoothed annual hazard rate curve showed increasing mortality during this period. Cox regression identified seven unfavorable factors at diagnosis, but only distant metastases remained after five years of survival. Analysis of the annual hazard rate curves showed that mortality continued to decrease for most survivors, except for metastatic IBC. CONCLUSION: Real-time survival of IBC improved dynamically over time, and the magnitude of this improvement was non-linear, depending on survival time and clinicopathological characteristics.

Conditional Cancer-Specific Survival for Inflammatory Breast Cancer: Analysis of SEER, 2010 to 2016.

BACKGROUND: Conditional survival takes into account the time that has elapsed since diagnosis and may have additional informative value. Compared with the static traditional survival evaluation method, conditional survival predictions can be adapted to incorporate the dynamic changes during the disease and provide a more suitable way of identifying time-evolved prognoses. METHODS: Of 3333 patients diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer between 2010 and 2016 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The trend of the hazard rate over time was represented by the kernel density smoothing curve. The traditional cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Conditional CSS assessment was defined as the probability that a patient will survive y years given the x years who already survived after diagnosis, and the formula is as follows: CS(y)=CSS(x + y)/CSS(x). 3-year cancer-specific survival (CSS3) and 3-year conditional cancer-specific survival (CS3) were estimated. The Fine-Gray proportional subdistribution hazard model was constructed to screen for time-dependent risk factors associated with cancer-specific death. Subsequently, a nomogram was applied to predict a 5-year survival rate based on the number of years already survived. RESULTS: Of 3333 patients, the cancer-specific survival (CSS) rate decreased from 57% in the 4th year to 49% in the 6th year, while the comparable 3-year CS (CS3) rate improved from 65% in the first year to 76% in the third year. Overall, the CS3 rate was superior to actuarial cancer-specific survival, which was also found in subgroup analysis, especially in patients with high-risk characteristics. The Fine-Gray's model indicated that remote organ metastasis (M stage), lymph node metastasis (N stage), and surgery all significantly impacted the prognosis for cancer-specific survival. The Fine-Gray's model-based nomogram was constructed to predict 5-year cancer-specific survival immediately after diagnosis and given survival for 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSION: High-risk patients had a significantly improved cancer-specific survival prognosis after surviving for 1 or more years after diagnosis with inflammatory breast cancer. The probability of reaching 5-year cancer-specific survival following diagnosis improves with each additional year survived. More effective follow-up is required for patients diagnosed at an advanced N stage, remote organ metastasis, or not received surgery. Additionally, a nomogram and web-based calculator may be helpful for patients with inflammatory breast cancer during follow-up counseling (https://ibccondsurv.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/).

Tailoring Treatment for Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

OPINION STATEMENT: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare but aggressive subtype of breast cancer that has a propensity for locoregional recurrence and distant metastasis and is associated with a disproportionately high percentage of breast cancer deaths. IBC is not resectable at initial diagnosis and trimodality therapy is considered the standard treatment for IBC. This includes systemic therapy upfront, followed by modified radical mastectomy and comprehensive chest wall and regional node radiation. Despite this aggressive multi-modal treatment strategy, the prognosis remains worse in IBC when compared with non-inflammatory locally advanced breast cancers. For patients presenting with de novo stage IV IBC, treatment recommendations vary depending on tumor burden, cancer subtype, and presence of comorbidities. Efforts to improve outcomes in IBC are currently underway; however, progress has been affected by the low incidence of disease and limited number of dedicated studies in this population. Improvements in systemic therapies in breast cancer in general are likely to lead to improvements in IBC as well. More dedicated trials are needed to identify additional treatment strategies that may help to improve prognosis for these patients. Additionally, better frameworks for diagnosis, risk stratification based upon factors such as molecular subtype and response to neoadjuvant therapy, will be important to make further progress in IBC.

Complete response in the axilla and the non-triple negative subtype are favourable prognostic factors for survival outcomes in inflammatory breast cancer.

AIM: To assess real-world outcomes and prognostic factors of non-metastatic inflammatory breast cancer according to immunohistochemistry (IHC)-based subtype and treatment regimen. METHODS: An institutional retrospective analysis of patients treated with neoadjuvant systemic treatment (NAST) for stage III inflammatory breast cancer diagnosed between 2001 and 2018 was performed. The survival outcomes in relation to patient characteristics, tumour characteristics, treatment modality and response to NAST were analyzed. RESULTS: 225 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 90% of patients were node-positive. IHC-based subtypes: 39.1% were HR+/HER2-, 19.1% HR+/HER2+, 23.1% HR-/HER2+ and 18.7% HR-/HER2-. Treatment was multimodal: NAST (100%), surgery (94.2%) and radiotherapy (94.2%). 53.3% of patients received adjuvant endocrine therapy, 34.3% (neo)adjuvant trastuzumab. Tri-modality therapy was applied in 89.3% of patients. Following NAST, a pathologic complete remission (pCR) in the breast was found in 16.9%, in the axilla in 29.7% and in both the breast and axilla in 10.3% of patients. The axillary pCR rate was significantly higher in HR- subtypes. Median overall survival (OS) was 8.9, 7.2, 5.8 and 2.3 years (p < 0.001) for HR+/HER2-, HR+/HER2+, HR-/HER2+ and HR-/HER2- subtype, respectively. On multivariate analysis, IHC-based subtype, age and axillary pCR were found as independent prognostic factors for RFS and OS. pCR rate and median OS improved over time, 5.8% vs 14.7% and 4.7 vs 10.0 years (2001-2009 vs. 2010-2018), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Axillary pCR and the non-triple-negative IHC-based subtype are favourable prognostic factors for RFS and OS in inflammatory breast cancer. Introduction of taxanes and antiHER2 drugs contributed to improved pCR rate and OS.

Incidence, characteristics, and management of central nervous system metastases in patients with inflammatory breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Patients with inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) have a high risk of central nervous system metastasis (mCNS). The purpose of this study was to quantify the incidence of and identify risk factors for mCNS in patients with IBC. METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed patients diagnosed with IBC between 1997 and 2019. mCNS-free survival time was defined as the date from the diagnosis of IBC to the date of diagnosis of mCNS or the date of death, whichever occurred first. A competing risks hazard model was used to evaluate risk factors for mCNS. RESULTS: A total of 531 patients were identified; 372 patients with stage III and 159 patients with de novo stage IV disease. During the study, there were a total of 124 patients who had mCNS. The 1-, 2-, and 5-year incidence of mCNS was 5%, 9%, and 18% in stage III patients (median follow-up: 5.6 years) and 17%, 30%, and 42% in stage IV patients (1.8 years). Multivariate analysis identified triple-negative tumor subtype as a significant risk factor for mCNS for stage III patients. For patients diagnosed with metastatic disease, visceral metastasis as first metastatic site, triple-negative subtype, and younger age at diagnosis of metastases were risk factors for mCNS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with IBC, particularly those with triple-negative IBC, visceral metastasis, and those at a younger age at diagnosis of metastatic disease, are at significant risk of developing mCNS. Further investigation into prevention of mCNS and whether early detection of mCNS is associated with improved IBC patient outcomes is warranted.

Proactive Immunotherapeutic Approaches against Inflammatory Breast Cancer May Improve Patient Outcomes.

Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is highly metastatic at the onset of the disease with no IBC-specific treatments, resulting in dismal patient survival. IBC treatment is a clear unmet clinical need. This commentary highlights findings from a recent seminal approach in which pembrolizumab, a checkpoint inhibitor against programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1), was provided to a triple-negative IBC patient as a neoadjuvant immune therapy combined with anthracycline-taxane-based chemotherapy. We highlight the findings of the case report and offer a perspective on taking a proactive approach to deploy approved immune checkpoint inhibitors. On the basis of our recently published research study, we propose in situ vaccination with direct injection of immunostimulatory agents into the tumor as an option to improve outcomes safely, effectively, and economically for IBC patients.

Guideline-Consistent Treatment for Inflammatory Breast Cancer Provides Associated Survival Benefit Independent of Age.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-consistent treatment (GCT) for inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC), modified radical mastectomy (MRM), and radiation. We hypothesized that younger patients more frequently receive GCT, resulting in survival differences. METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2004-2018), female patients with unilateral IBC (by histology code and clinical stage T4d) were stratified by age (< 50, 50-65, > 65 years). Factors associated with NAC, MRM, radiation, and "GCT" (defined as all three treatments) were identified using multivariable logistic regression. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression identified predictors of overall survival. RESULTS: Of 3278 IBC patients, 30% were younger than 50 years, 44% were 50-65 years of age, and 26% were older than 65 years. The youngest group comprised the greatest proportion of non-White patients ([35%] vs. [29%] age 50-65 years and [23%] age > 65 years, p < 0.001) and was most often treated at academic facilities ([33%] vs. [28%] age 50-65 years; and [23%] age > 65, p < 0.001). Patients older than 65 years received NAC, MRM, and radiation less frequently, and only 35% underwent GCT (vs. [57%] age 50-65 years and [52%] age < 50 years; p < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, age older than 65 years independently predicted omission of NAC (odds ratio [OR], 0.36), MRM (OR, 0.56), and radiation (OR, 0.56) (all p < 0.001), and patients older than 65 years also were less likely to undergo GCT than patients 50-65 years of age (OR, 0.65; p = 0.001). GCT was associated with superior overall survival in all three age groups ([hazard ratio {HR}, 0.61] age < 50 years, [HR, 0.62] age 50-65 years, [HR, 0.53] age > 65 years; all p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Advanced age alone should not limit receipt of GCT for IBC. Multimodal care should be performed for IBC patients of all ages to improve oncologic outcomes for this aggressive breast cancer subtype.

Long-term Oncologic Outcomes in Patients with Inflammatory Breast Cancer with Supraclavicular Nodal Involvement.

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive subtype of breast cancer characterized by rapid progression and early metastasis, often with advanced nodal locations, including the supraclavicular (SCV) nodal basin. Previously considered M1 disease, ipsilateral clinical supraclavicular node involvement (N3c) disease is now considered locally advanced disease and warrants treatment with intent to cure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with IBC and N3c disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted using a prospectively collected database of all patients with IBC treated at a dedicated cancer center from 2007 to 2019. Surgical patients with SCV nodal involvement and complete follow-up were identified. Our primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine predictors for survival. Event-free survival (EFS) and OS were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: There were 70 patients who met inclusion criteria. All patients underwent comprehensive trimodality therapy. The majority of patients had complete (66.2%) radiologic response in the SCV nodal basins following neoadjuvant therapy. Six patients (8.6%) had a locoregional recurrence, with two (2.9%) occurring in the supraclavicular fossa. The 5-year OS was 60.2% [95% confidence interval (CI) 47.7-72.7%]. Increasing age (hazard ratio 2.7; p = 0.03) and triple-negative subtype (hazard ratio 4.9; p = 0.03) were associated with poor OS. The 5-year EFS was 56.1% (95% CI 40.9-68.8%). The presence of more than ten positive axillary nodes on final surgical pathology (hazard ratio 5.5; p = 0.01) predicted poor EFS. CONCLUSIONS: With comprehensive trimodality therapy and multidisciplinary team approach, patients with IBC with supraclavicular nodal involvement experience excellent locoregional control and favorable survival.

Lymphedema in Inflammatory Breast Cancer Patients Following Trimodal Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is a debilitating sequela of breast cancer treatment and is becoming a greater concern in light of improved long-term survival. Inflammatory breast cancer (IBC) is a rare and aggressive malignancy for which systemic therapy, surgery, and radiotherapy remain the standard of care, thereby making IBC patients highly susceptible to developing BCRL. This study evaluated BCRL in IBC following trimodal therapy. METHODS: IBC patients treated from 2016 to 2019 were identified from an institutional database. Patients were excluded if they presented with recurrent disease, underwent bilateral axillary surgery, did not complete trimodal therapy, or were lost to follow-up. Demographic, clinicopathologic factors, oncologic outcomes, and perometer measurements were recorded. BCRL was defined by clinician diagnosis and/or objective perometer measurements when available. Time to development of BCRL and treatment received were captured. RESULTS: Eighty-three patients were included. Median follow-up was 33 months. The incidence of BCRL was 50.6% (n = 42). Mean time to BCRL from surgery was 13 (range 2-24) months. Demographic and clinicopathologic features were similar between patients with and without BCRL with exception of higher proportion receiving delayed reconstruction in the BCRL group (38.1% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.03). Forty patients (95.2%) underwent BCRL treatment, which included physical therapy (n = 39), compression (n = 38), therapeutic lymphovenous bypass (n = 13), and/or vascularized lymph node transfer (n = 12). CONCLUSIONS: IBC patients are at high-risk for BCRL after treatment, impacting 51% of patients in this cohort. Strategies to reduce or prevent BCRL and improve real-time diagnosis should be implemented to better direct early management in this patient population.

Inflammatory breast cancer defined: proposed common diagnostic criteria to guide treatment and research.

PURPOSE: Inflammatory breast cancer is a deadly and aggressive type of breast cancer. A key challenge relates to the need for a more detailed, formal, objective definition of IBC, the lack of which compromises clinical care, hampers the conduct of clinical trials, and hinders the search for IBC-specific biomarkers and treatments because of the heterogeneity of patients considered to have IBC. METHODS: Susan G. Komen, the Inflammatory Breast Cancer Research Foundation, and the Milburn Foundation convened patient advocates, clinicians, and researchers to review the state of IBC and to propose initiatives to advance the field. After literature review of the defining clinical, pathologic, and imaging characteristics of IBC, the experts developed a novel quantitative scoring system for diagnosis. RESULTS: The experts identified through consensus several "defining characteristics" of IBC, including factors related to timing of onset and specific symptoms. These reflect common pathophysiologic changes, sometimes detectable on biopsy in the form of dermal lymphovascular tumor emboli and often reflected in imaging findings. Based on the importance and extent of these characteristics, the experts developed a scoring scale that yields a continuous score from 0 to 48 and proposed cut-points for categorization that can be tested in subsequent validation studies. CONCLUSION: To move beyond subjective 'clinical diagnosis' of IBC, we propose a quantitative scoring system to define IBC, based on clinical, pathologic, and imaging features. This system is intended to predict outcome and biology, guide treatment decisions and inclusion in clinical trials, and increase diagnostic accuracy to aid basic research; future validation studies are necessary to evaluate its performance.

Inflammatory breast cancer, trimodal treatment, and mortality: Does where you live matter?

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study is to examine the associations among neighborhood socioeconomic status, trimodal treatment, and disease-specific mortality among inflammatory breast cancer patients using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with inflammatory breast cancer (T4d) from 2010 to 2016 were identified in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The cohort was stratified into neighborhood socioeconomic status groups (low, middle, high) based on National Cancer Institute census tract-level index. Trimodal treatment was defined as receipt of modified radical mastectomy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Bivariable analysis, log-rank test, and a Cox proportional hazards model (hazard ratio, 95% confidence interval) were conducted to evaluate the relationship between neighborhood socioeconomic status, trimodal treatment, and disease-specific mortality. RESULTS: In total, 4,374 patients met study criteria. There was no difference between the neighborhood socioeconomic status groups in receipt of trimodal treatment (P = .19). On multivariable analysis, there was no association between low neighborhood socioeconomic status (hazard ratio 1.13, 0.98-1.30; ref high neighborhood socioeconomic status) or middle neighborhood socioeconomic status (hazard ratio 1.01, 0.88-1.64; ref high neighborhood socioeconomic status) and disease-specific mortality. Notably, triple negative subtype (hazard ratio 2.66, 2.21-3.20; ref luminal A) and Black race (hazard ratio 1.41, 1.16-1.72; ref White) were associated with a higher disease-specific mortality. CONCLUSION: For inflammatory breast cancer patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, disease-specific mortality appears to be driven by tumor biology and patient characteristics instead of treatment disparities or neighborhood socioeconomic status.